FlawPilot vs Aikido Security
An application security platform covering SAST, dependency scanning, secrets, containers, IaC, cloud posture and DAST.
FlawPilot
Free
to start, no card
- Four pillars on the live scan, plus source code from a connected repo
- Live scan needs no credentials or agent
- Engineers available to do the fixes
Aikido Security
Free / $300 / $600
Developer plan: free forever, 2 users, 10 repos
USD list price: Basic $300/mo and Pro $600/mo, 10 users included; Advanced is also $600/mo with higher usage limits. 10% off annual. Aikido sets prices per region rather than converting, so their page shows a different ladder in other currencies - in INR it reads Basic Rs 23,000, Pro Rs 46,000 and Advanced Rs 69,000 a month, where Advanced is priced above Pro. Check their page from your own region. Pentests are priced separately, from $50 to $30,000+ per assessment.
FlawPilot vs Aikido Security, feature by feature
What each tool actually delivers, not a checkbox count. Read from Aikido Security’s own public pages on 2026-09-07; where those pages do not settle something, it is not counted against them.
| Feature | FlawPilot4/4 | Aikido Security2/4 |
|---|---|---|
| FullAll four pillars in one ranked report, no account and no card. | None | |
| HTTP security headers | Yes | No |
| TLS / SSL configuration | Yes | No |
| Cookie security flags | Yes | No |
| DNS records | Yes | No |
| Email auth (SPF/DKIM/DMARC) | Yes | No |
| Performance | Yes | No |
| SEO | Yes | No |
| FullThree engines scored separately - insecure code, secrets across full git history, and CVEs with an SBOM. | Full | |
| Source-code scanning | Yes | Yes |
| Hardcoded secrets | Yes | Yes |
| Dependency CVEs | Yes | Yes |
| FullNative MCP servers for both Claude and ChatGPT. | Full | |
| MCP server (Claude, ChatGPT) | Yes | Yes |
| FullDocumented REST API, plus an embeddable status badge. | PartialNo Embeddable status badge |
"Partial" means real but narrower coverage, and does not count toward the score - the cell says what is missing. Open a feature to see the individual checks behind it.
Where each tool wins
A comparison page where the competitor never wins reads as an advert. Here is the case for Aikido Security, and the case against us, alongside the case for FlawPilot.
What Aikido Security does better
Container, IaC and cloud-posture scanning cover an entire surface FlawPilot does not touch, and their free tier is genuinely usable for a small team.
Where FlawPilot differs
Aikido secures what you build and deploy to; FlawPilot reads the deployed result from the outside - headers, TLS, DNS, email authentication - plus performance and SEO.
Pick Aikido Security when
Cloud posture and container security are the priority.
One scan, or Aikido Security plus 10 more
Aikido Security fully delivers 2 of 4 features. Watch what a single pass has to check, and who checks it.
- Source-code scanningAikido Security
- Hardcoded secretsAikido Security
- Dependency CVEsAikido Security
- MCP server (Claude, ChatGPT)Aikido Security
- HTTP security headers+ header checker
- TLS / SSL configuration+ TLS grader
- Cookie security flags+ cookie auditor
- DNS records+ DNS lookup tool
- Email auth (SPF/DKIM/DMARC)+ SPF/DMARC checker
- Performance+ Lighthouse
- SEO+ SEO crawler
- …and 3 more
11 dashboards, 11 severity scales, one manual triage.
one pass1 tool1tool. FlawPilot, one scan, no card
All 4 features in a single pass - including the 10 checks Aikido Security does not cover, which would otherwise mean 10 more tools to buy, learn and reconcile.
- One dashboard, not 11
- One severity scale, so findings rank against each other
- One ranked list, already triaged
Free to start, no card.
Common questions
What people ask before running a scan against Aikido Security.
Compare them on your own site
Run a free FlawPilot live scan and read the ranked list yourself. No account, no card.
Aikido Security details read from aikido.dev/pricing, help.aikido.dev/ai-and-dev-tools/aikido-mcp, www.aikido.dev/pricing on 2026-09-07. Pricing changes - if something here is out of date, tell us and we will correct it.