FlawPilot vs SimplyScan
A scanner aimed at apps built with Lovable, Bolt.new, Cursor and Replit, running 51+ checks across security, speed, SEO, accessibility and GDPR, with GitHub repo scanning.
FlawPilot
Free
to start, no card
- Four pillars on the live scan, plus source code from a connected repo
- Live scan needs no credentials or agent
- Engineers available to do the fixes
SimplyScan
Free scan, $14.99 report
Free limited scan
Pro Report is a one-off with 2 rescans; early-adopter pricing they say will rise.
FlawPilot vs SimplyScan, feature by feature
What each tool actually delivers, not a checkbox count. Read from SimplyScan’s own public pages on 2026-09-07; where those pages do not settle something, it is not counted against them.
| Feature | FlawPilot4/4 | SimplyScan2/4 |
|---|---|---|
| FullAll four pillars in one ranked report, no account and no card. | PartialNo Cookie security flags | |
| HTTP security headers | Yes | Yes |
| TLS / SSL configuration | Yes | Yes |
| Cookie security flags | Yes | Not stated |
| DNS records | Yes | Yes |
| Email auth (SPF/DKIM/DMARC) | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | Yes | Yes |
| SEO | Yes | Yes |
| FullThree engines scored separately - insecure code, secrets across full git history, and CVEs with an SBOM. | Full | |
| Source-code scanning | Yes | Yes |
| Hardcoded secrets | Yes | Yes |
| Dependency CVEs | Yes | Yes |
| FullNative MCP servers for both Claude and ChatGPT. | Full | |
| MCP server (Claude, ChatGPT) | Yes | Yes |
| FullDocumented REST API, plus an embeddable status badge. | PartialNo REST API |
"Partial" means real but narrower coverage, and does not count toward the score - the cell says what is missing. Open a feature to see the individual checks behind it.
Where each tool wins
A comparison page where the competitor never wins reads as an advert. Here is the case for SimplyScan, and the case against us, alongside the case for FlawPilot.
What SimplyScan does better
They publish accessibility and GDPR checks, and an AI-visibility check, which a FlawPilot scan does not cover. On breadth of check categories they are our closest match.
Where FlawPilot differs
FlawPilot connects three Git providers rather than GitHub alone, runs over MCP from Claude or ChatGPT, and puts Logicwind engineers behind the remediation rather than stopping at the report.
Pick SimplyScan when
You want accessibility and GDPR checks in the same pass.
One scan, or SimplyScan plus 1 more
SimplyScan fully delivers 2 of 4 features. Watch what a single pass has to check, and who checks it.
- HTTP security headersSimplyScan
- TLS / SSL configurationSimplyScan
- DNS recordsSimplyScan
- Email auth (SPF/DKIM/DMARC)SimplyScan
- Engineers available to fix it+ agency or contractor
2 dashboards, 2 severity scales, one manual triage.
one pass1 tool1tool. FlawPilot, one scan, no card
All 4 features in a single pass - including the 1 check SimplyScan does not cover, which would otherwise mean 1 more tool to buy, learn and reconcile.
- One dashboard, not 2
- One severity scale, so findings rank against each other
- One ranked list, already triaged
Free to start, no card.
Common questions
What people ask before running a scan against SimplyScan.
Compare them on your own site
Run a free FlawPilot live scan and read the ranked list yourself. No account, no card.
SimplyScan details read from simplyscan.io, simplyscan.io/mcp, simplyscan.io/badge, simplyscan.io/tools on 2026-09-07. Pricing changes - if something here is out of date, tell us and we will correct it.