FlawPilot vs Trust Scan Me
An AI security scanner for independent developers, scanning a live URL or a GitHub repo with Nuclei, Semgrep and Gitleaks, and opening fix pull requests.
FlawPilot
Free
to start, no card
- Four pillars on the live scan, plus source code from a connected repo
- Live scan needs no credentials or agent
- Engineers available to do the fixes
Trust Scan Me
From $9.90/mo
Free tier: 5 URL scans and 3 repo scans a month
Launch price; the published regular price is $12/mo. Yearly billing saves 17%.
FlawPilot vs Trust Scan Me, feature by feature
What each tool actually delivers, not a checkbox count. Read from Trust Scan Me’s own public pages on 2026-09-07; where those pages do not settle something, it is not counted against them.
| Feature | FlawPilot4/4 | Trust Scan Me2/4 |
|---|---|---|
| FullAll four pillars in one ranked report, no account and no card. | None | |
| HTTP security headers | Yes | Not stated |
| TLS / SSL configuration | Yes | Not stated |
| Cookie security flags | Yes | Not stated |
| DNS records | Yes | Not stated |
| Email auth (SPF/DKIM/DMARC) | Yes | Not stated |
| Performance | Yes | No |
| SEO | Yes | No |
| FullThree engines scored separately - insecure code, secrets across full git history, and CVEs with an SBOM. | Full | |
| Source-code scanning | Yes | Yes |
| Hardcoded secrets | Yes | Yes |
| Dependency CVEs | Yes | Yes |
| FullNative MCP servers for both Claude and ChatGPT. | Full | |
| MCP server (Claude, ChatGPT) | Yes | Yes |
| FullDocumented REST API, plus an embeddable status badge. | None |
"Partial" means real but narrower coverage, and does not count toward the score - the cell says what is missing. Open a feature to see the individual checks behind it.
Where each tool wins
A comparison page where the competitor never wins reads as an advert. Here is the case for Trust Scan Me, and the case against us, alongside the case for FlawPilot.
What Trust Scan Me does better
They ship an MCP server for IDE integration and open fix pull requests automatically - two things FlawPilot either matches or deliberately does not do. Their 10,000+ Nuclei templates go deeper on known-CVE detection than our scan.
Where FlawPilot differs
FlawPilot covers performance, SEO, DNS and email authentication in the same pass, and connects GitLab and Bitbucket as well as GitHub.
Pick Trust Scan Me when
You want automated fix PRs and Nuclei-template CVE depth.
One scan, or Trust Scan Me plus 4 more
Trust Scan Me fully delivers 2 of 4 features. Watch what a single pass has to check, and who checks it.
- Source-code scanningTrust Scan Me
- Hardcoded secretsTrust Scan Me
- Dependency CVEsTrust Scan Me
- MCP server (Claude, ChatGPT)Trust Scan Me
- Performance+ Lighthouse
- SEO+ SEO crawler
- All five pillars covered+ several tools
- Engineers available to fix it+ agency or contractor
5 dashboards, 5 severity scales, one manual triage.
one pass1 tool1tool. FlawPilot, one scan, no card
All 4 features in a single pass - including the 4 checks Trust Scan Me does not cover, which would otherwise mean 4 more tools to buy, learn and reconcile.
- One dashboard, not 5
- One severity scale, so findings rank against each other
- One ranked list, already triaged
Free to start, no card.
Common questions
What people ask before running a scan against Trust Scan Me.
Compare them on your own site
Run a free FlawPilot live scan and read the ranked list yourself. No account, no card.
Trust Scan Me details read from www.trust-scan.me, www.trust-scan.me/pricing on 2026-09-07. Pricing changes - if something here is out of date, tell us and we will correct it.