FlawPilot vs Barrion
A security testing platform combining passive scanning of live apps, GitHub codebase scanning and AI-driven penetration testing.
FlawPilot
Free
to start, no card
- Four pillars on the live scan, plus source code from a connected repo
- Live scan needs no credentials or agent
- Engineers available to do the fixes
Barrion
Free / $39 / $179 / Custom
Free plan: 18 core checks, 3 pages, 5 scans/day, no credit card
Essential $39/mo and Business $179/mo, both after a 7-day free trial; Enterprise is custom. 20% off yearly.
FlawPilot vs Barrion, feature by feature
What each tool actually delivers, not a checkbox count. Read from Barrion’s own public pages on 2026-09-07; where those pages do not settle something, it is not counted against them.
| Feature | FlawPilot4/4 | Barrion1/4 |
|---|---|---|
| FullAll four pillars in one ranked report, no account and no card. | PartialNo Performance and 1 more | |
| HTTP security headers | Yes | Yes |
| TLS / SSL configuration | Yes | Yes |
| Cookie security flags | Yes | Yes |
| DNS records | Yes | Yes |
| Email auth (SPF/DKIM/DMARC) | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | Yes | No |
| SEO | Yes | No |
| FullThree engines scored separately - insecure code, secrets across full git history, and CVEs with an SBOM. | Full | |
| Source-code scanning | Yes | Yes |
| Hardcoded secrets | Yes | Yes |
| Dependency CVEs | Yes | Yes |
| FullNative MCP servers for both Claude and ChatGPT. | None | |
| MCP server (Claude, ChatGPT) | Yes | Not stated |
| FullDocumented REST API, plus an embeddable status badge. | None |
"Partial" means real but narrower coverage, and does not count toward the score - the cell says what is missing. Open a feature to see the individual checks behind it.
Where each tool wins
A comparison page where the competitor never wins reads as an advert. Here is the case for Barrion, and the case against us, alongside the case for FlawPilot.
What Barrion does better
AI-driven penetration testing goes further than a passive scan, and their free tier allows up to five scans a day across three pages.
Where FlawPilot differs
FlawPilot adds performance and SEO to the same report, connects GitLab and Bitbucket as well as GitHub, and runs over MCP.
Pick Barrion when
You want AI-driven pen testing alongside a passive scan.
One scan, or Barrion plus 4 more
Barrion fully delivers 1 of 4 features. Watch what a single pass has to check, and who checks it.
- HTTP security headersBarrion
- TLS / SSL configurationBarrion
- Cookie security flagsBarrion
- DNS recordsBarrion
- Performance+ Lighthouse
- SEO+ SEO crawler
- All five pillars covered+ several tools
- Engineers available to fix it+ agency or contractor
5 dashboards, 5 severity scales, one manual triage.
one pass1 tool1tool. FlawPilot, one scan, no card
All 4 features in a single pass - including the 4 checks Barrion does not cover, which would otherwise mean 4 more tools to buy, learn and reconcile.
- One dashboard, not 5
- One severity scale, so findings rank against each other
- One ranked list, already triaged
Free to start, no card.
Common questions
What people ask before running a scan against Barrion.
Compare them on your own site
Run a free FlawPilot live scan and read the ranked list yourself. No account, no card.
Barrion details read from barrion.io/pricing on 2026-09-07. Pricing changes - if something here is out of date, tell us and we will correct it.