FlawPilot vs SiteSecurityScore
A site security scanner covering HTTP headers, TLS certificate expiry, cookies, DNS, email authentication, CSP, vulnerable JavaScript libraries and mixed content.
FlawPilot
Free
to start, no card
- Four pillars on the live scan, plus source code from a connected repo
- Live scan needs no credentials or agent
- Engineers available to do the fixes
SiteSecurityScore
Free / $7 / $23
Free scan; a work email is required for full free-tier access
FlawPilot vs SiteSecurityScore, feature by feature
What each tool actually delivers, not a checkbox count. Read from SiteSecurityScore’s own public pages on 2026-09-07; where those pages do not settle something, it is not counted against them.
| Feature | FlawPilot4/4 | SiteSecurityScore1/4 |
|---|---|---|
| FullAll four pillars in one ranked report, no account and no card. | PartialNo Performance and 1 more | |
| HTTP security headers | Yes | Yes |
| TLS / SSL configuration | Yes | Yes |
| Cookie security flags | Yes | Yes |
| DNS records | Yes | Yes |
| Email auth (SPF/DKIM/DMARC) | Yes | Yes |
| Performance | Yes | No |
| SEO | Yes | No |
| FullThree engines scored separately - insecure code, secrets across full git history, and CVEs with an SBOM. | PartialNo Source-code scanning and 1 more | |
| Source-code scanning | Yes | No |
| Hardcoded secrets | Yes | No |
| Dependency CVEs | Yes | Yes |
| FullNative MCP servers for both Claude and ChatGPT. | Full | |
| MCP server (Claude, ChatGPT) | Yes | Yes |
| FullDocumented REST API, plus an embeddable status badge. | PartialNo Embeddable status badge |
"Partial" means real but narrower coverage, and does not count toward the score - the cell says what is missing. Open a feature to see the individual checks behind it.
Where each tool wins
A comparison page where the competitor never wins reads as an advert. Here is the case for SiteSecurityScore, and the case against us, alongside the case for FlawPilot.
What SiteSecurityScore does better
CSP violation reporting is a genuine feature FlawPilot does not offer, and at $7/mo the paid tier is the cheapest monitoring on this list.
Where FlawPilot differs
FlawPilot adds performance, SEO and source-code scanning to the same report, and needs no email for a first result.
Pick SiteSecurityScore when
You want CSP violation reporting on a small budget.
One scan, or SiteSecurityScore plus 7 more
SiteSecurityScore fully delivers 1 of 4 features. Watch what a single pass has to check, and who checks it.
- HTTP security headersSiteSecurityScore
- TLS / SSL configurationSiteSecurityScore
- Cookie security flagsSiteSecurityScore
- DNS recordsSiteSecurityScore
- Performance+ Lighthouse
- SEO+ SEO crawler
- Source-code scanning+ SAST tool
- Hardcoded secrets+ secrets scanner
- All five pillars covered+ several tools
- Live scan with no signup+ an account
- Engineers available to fix it+ agency or contractor
8 dashboards, 8 severity scales, one manual triage.
one pass1 tool1tool. FlawPilot, one scan, no card
All 4 features in a single pass - including the 7 checks SiteSecurityScore does not cover, which would otherwise mean 7 more tools to buy, learn and reconcile.
- One dashboard, not 8
- One severity scale, so findings rank against each other
- One ranked list, already triaged
Free to start, no card.
Common questions
What people ask before running a scan against SiteSecurityScore.
Compare them on your own site
Run a free FlawPilot live scan and read the ranked list yourself. No account, no card.
SiteSecurityScore details read from sitesecurityscore.com/pricing on 2026-09-07. Pricing changes - if something here is out of date, tell us and we will correct it.